STUDI KOMPARATIF KINERJA REKSADANA SAHAM SYARIAH DAN KONVENSIONAL STUDI KASUS DI INDONESIA

Ahmad Rifa’i, Muhammad Rafi Siregar

Abstract


This study aims to determine whether there is a difference between the performance of conventional and sharia mutual funds and to find out the difference between the sharia index (JII) and the conventional index (IHSG). The population of this research is all stock mutual funds that cooperate with Indo Premier Sekuritas. Based on the purposive sampling method, there were 65 samples consisting of 14 Islamic stock mutual funds and 51 conventional stock mutual funds. Empirical results show that the performance of Islamic mutual funds is lower than that of conventional mutual funds. In addition, the performance of Islamic and conventional equity mutual funds is better than JII and JCI.

Keywords


Sharia Mutual Funds; Conventional Mutual Funds; Sharia Index; Conventional Index;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, F., Hassan, T., & Mohamad, S. (2007). Investigation of performance of Malaysian Islamic unit trust funds. Managerial Finance, 33(2), 142-153

Ashraf, D. (2013). Performance evaluation of Islamic mutual funds relative to conventional funds: Empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 6(2), 105-121.

Boo, Y. L., Ee, M. S., Li, B., & Rashid, M. (2017). Islamic or conventional mutual funds: Who has the upper hand? Evidence from Malaysia. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 42, 183-192.

Elfakhani, S., Hassan, M. K., & Yusuf, S. (2013). Comparative Performance of Islamic Versus Secular Mutual Funds. In 12th Economic Research Forum Conference in Cairo, Egypt (pp. 19-21).

Fadillah Mansor, M. I. B. (2017). Evidence Of Risk and Return Performance of Islamic Mutual Funds: The Case of Malaysia. Advances in Islamic Finance, Marketing, and Management, 81–101.

Gallefoss, K., Hansen, H. H., Haukaas, E. S., & Molnár, P. (2015). What daily data can tell us about mutual funds : Evidence from Norway. Journal Of Banking FinaNCE, 55, 117–129.

Hayat, R., & Kraeussl, R. (2011). Risk and return characteristics of Islamic equity funds. Emerging Markets Review, 12(2), 189–203.

Indonesia, R. (1995). Republic Of Indonesia Law No. 8 Year 1995 Regarding Capital Market.

Indonesia, R. (2015). Regulation Of The Financial Services Authority Number 19/Pojk.04/2015 About Publishing And The Requirements Of Sharia-Compliant Mutual Funds.

Indonesia, R. (2018). Statistics Of Sharia Capital Market.

M. (2012). Comparative Valuation between Islamic and Conventional Mutual Fund. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 96(May), 28–34.

Kraeussl, R., & Hayat, R. (2008). The performance of Islamic equity funds, (February 2011). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1320712 Market, I. C. (2018). IDX Monthly

Statistics, 27(2).

Norman, Nbt, Almsafir, M. K., & Smadi, A. (2013). “Comparative Study of Conventional and Sharia-based Unit Trusts Funds Performance of Public Mutual Berhad.” Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 7(9), 354–363.

Othman, J., Asutay, M., & Jamilan, N. (2018). Comparing the determinants of fund flows in domestically managed Malaysian Islamic and conventional equity funds. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 9(3), 401-414.

Rafay, A., Javed, U., & Izhar, M. A. (2017). Investigating The Performance Of Islamic Mutual Funds : Evidence From An Emerging Economy, 7(2), 234–241.

Rao, Z.-R., Tauni, M. Z., Iqbal, A., & Umar, M. (2017). Emerging market mutual fund performance: evidence for China. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 11(2), 167–187.

Thavaramara, M. T. (2010). Progress and Issues in Capital Markets Integration : ASEAN Experience, (February).

Yunanto, A., Daryono, Wahyudi, S., Ghozali, I., & Udin. (2017). The Value Relevance of the Retail Trade Industry: Evidence from Southeast Asian Countries. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(12), 519-526.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53990/djei.v3i2.232

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.